Total Complaints
9 filings
VOLVO VN770 · model year
9 NHTSA complaints for this specific cohort.
NHTSA overall rating
Not crash-tested
New Car Assessment Program
The 2001VOLVOVN770 carries 9 consumer safety complaints in NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation database for this specific model-year cohort. Within that volume, owners reported 0 crashes, 0 fires, 0 injuries, and 0 fatalities. No NCAP 5-star crash-test rating is available for this model year in the federal database.
Component-level analysis is where model-year complaints become actionable: the top complaint category for the 2001 VN770 is fuel system, gasoline:delivery with 2 filings, followed by electrical system:wiring:interior/under dash (2) and visibility:glass, side/rear (1). Concentration in one or two component groups is the classic signature of a systemic defect; a flat distribution usually reflects normal aging, warranty complaints, or isolated build-plant variability.
NHTSA currently has 28 investigation files overlapping the 2001 VN770. Owners comparing this cohort against neighboring years should pair the counters above with the complaint-by-year trend on the parent model page — a spike in a single year often tracks to a platform refresh, a new transmission supplier, or an updated ECU calibration. Use the related-complaint feed below to read raw owner narratives before deciding whether any pattern here affects your specific use case.
Total Complaints
9 filings
Crashes Reported
0 reports
Source
NHTSA ODI
Federal complaints database
At or below the fleet median complaint volume.
| Component | Count |
|---|---|
| FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY | 2 |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING:INTERIOR/UNDER DASH | 2 |
| VISIBILITY:GLASS, SIDE/REAR | 1 |
| POWER TRAIN:CLUTCH ASSEMBLY | 1 |
| EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER | 1 |
| POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE | 1 |
| FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM:INJECTORS | 1 |
INJECTOR TROUBLE CAUSING MAJOR ENGINE FAILURE. *AK
Mileage: 255,000
THE TRUCK HAD SEVERE DRIVELINE VIBRATION. CONSUMER STATES THAT THE TRUCK HAS BEEN TO THE DEALER SEVEN TIMES FOR THE SAME PROBLEM WITHOUT ANY SATISFACTION. *YH
CONSUMER STATES THAT THE FUEL LINE IS ROUTED BEHIND THE REAR OF THE ENGINE BLOCK, CAUSING IT TO CHAFE ON THE BLOCK, CONSUMER HAD TO REPLACE AND MODIFY SUPPORT OF THE LINE. *SLC
CONSUMER HAD TO REPLACE AIR CONDITIONING BLOWER MOTOR. *TT...*AK
THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE TRUCK HAD A WIRING HARNESS PROBLEM UNDER THE DASH. ALSO, THE ABS, TRACTION CONTROL, AND CHECK BRAKES AT NEXT STOP LIGHTS ILLUMINATED ON THE DASH. THE DEALER REPLACED THE MAIN WIRING HARNESS TWICE BUT THE PROBLEM WAS NOT SOLVED, CONSUMER WAS INFORMED HARNESS NEEDED REPLACED AGAIN. *YH
CONSUMER STATES THAT PROBLEMS HAVE OCCURRED WITH THE WIRING HARNESS UNDER THE DASH. *TT
THE MOON ROOF IN THE SLEEPER HAS SHATTERED TWICE, CONSUMER STATES THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF IMPACT BY OBJECT. *YH THE CLUTCH LEAKS TRANSMISSION FLUID AND WATER. *TT CONSUMER STATES THAT THE SKYLIGHT BLEW OUT. *TT
THE MOON ROOF IN THE SLEEPER HAS SHATTERED TWICE, CONSUMER STATES THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF IMPACT BY OBJECT. *YH THE CLUTCH LEAKS TRANSMISSION FLUID AND WATER. *TT CONSUMER STATES THAT THE SKYLIGHT BLEW OUT. *TT
CONSUMER STATES THAT THE FUEL LINE IS ROUTED BEHIND THE REAR OF THE ENGINE BLOCK, CAUSING IT TO CHAFE ON THE BLOCK, CONSUMER HAD TO REPLACE AND MODIFY SUPPORT OF THE LINE. *SLC
Data as of 2025. Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) complaints database, NHTSA recall campaign API, NHTSA NCAP crash-test ratings, and NHTSA FARS for fatality cross-reference.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.