Investigations
Ride Quality
NHTSA Defect Petition DP15006 — closed, opened 2015-09-28 and involving the VOLVO VOLVO.
NHTSA investigation DP15006 is a Defect Petition opened on 2015-09-28 and currently closed. The subject of record is VOLVO VOLVO, which places this file inside the Office of Defects Investigation queue for VOLVO. Latest activity on this investigation was logged on 2016-04-08 — NHTSA updates that field whenever an Information Request goes out, a supplement is filed, or a status change is recorded in the public docket.
A Defect Petition like DP15006 starts when a person or group formally asks NHTSA to investigate a specific alleged defect. Petitioners submit evidence, NHTSA reviews it within 120 days, and either grants the petition (opening a PE) or denies it with a written explanation in the Federal Register.
Investigators summarized the matter as follows: "The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this Defect Petition (DP) assessment in response to a defect petition received from owners of a 2015 Volvo VNL 780 tractor. Prior to submitting the letter the owners had s..." Investigations are the early-warning layer of the federal auto-safety system, sitting upstream of formal recalls and defect orders. Whether this one closes without action or escalates into an Engineering Analysis, the full history stays in the ODI archive so researchers, litigators, and buyers can pull the paper trail at any time. Related VOLVO files, listed below, give context on whether this is an isolated concern or part of a broader pattern across the brand.
Investigation Summary
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this Defect Petition (DP) assessment in response to a defect petition received from owners of a 2015 Volvo VNL 780 tractor. Prior to submitting the letter the owners had submitted two Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ). Their concerns included: cab sway, cab alignment , and loss of control. The petitioners further allege that due to a failure of the suspension system caused by cab misalignment one of them sustained a back injury while seated at the work station in the sleeper berth while traveling. The office received a total of six (6) complaints (1 via telephone) related to ride quality on 2013 -2016 Volvo VNL vehicles. Two (2) of the complaints were filed by the petitioners. Of the five (5) unique complaints, three (3) were received during the course of this evaluation. During this evaluation, the Owner/Operators Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) published an article in their magazine, Land Line, prompting the additional two reports. One owner reported owning three Volvo trucks, all of which had a tendency to sway and lean, yet he preferred the ride over other manufacturers peer vehicles. ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Volvo asking about the three concerns identified in the petition. The response indicated Volvo's cab air ride design has been in use since 2005. When evaluating each of the three concerns raised by the petitioners, ODI found that the complaint and warranty data did not establish existence of a defect trend for cab sway or loss of control. There were no reported injuries or loss of control events and less than 0.02% of the population had a cab sway concern. The majority of claims and complaints received involved cab alignment. The 2015 MY did stand out from the other MYs with over 1% of the 2015 population reporting cab alignment issues. This may indicate there is a defect in the design or production of the cab mounting, however there was no indication it created a safety risk. O
About This Investigation Type
A Defect Petition (DP) is initiated when an individual or organization formally petitions NHTSA to investigate a potential safety defect. NHTSA reviews the petition and decides whether to open an investigation.
Other VOLVO Investigations
Discrepancies in Required CFR Reporting
Windshield Wiper Failures
Volvo Sleeper glass de-bonding
Central Electronic Module Failure
FUEL PUMP LEAK
Data from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Cross-references: NHTSA recall campaign API and NHTSA FARS where fatality records overlap. PlainCars does not rate or recommend vehicles. Learn more.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.