Total Complaints
6 filings
SUZUKI SUZUKI · model year
6 NHTSA complaints for this specific cohort.
NHTSA overall rating
Not crash-tested
New Car Assessment Program
The 1999SUZUKISUZUKI carries 6 consumer safety complaints in NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation database for this specific model-year cohort. Within that volume, owners reported 0 crashes, 1 fire, 1 injury, and 0 fatalities. No NCAP 5-star crash-test rating is available for this model year in the federal database.
Component-level analysis is where model-year complaints become actionable: the top complaint category for the 1999 SUZUKI is equipment:appliance:air conditioner with 1 filings, followed by structure:frame and members (1) and engine and engine cooling:engine:gasoline (1). Concentration in one or two component groups is the classic signature of a systemic defect; a flat distribution usually reflects normal aging, warranty complaints, or isolated build-plant variability.
NHTSA currently has 9 investigation files overlapping the 1999 SUZUKI. Owners comparing this cohort against neighboring years should pair the counters above with the complaint-by-year trend on the parent model page — a spike in a single year often tracks to a platform refresh, a new transmission supplier, or an updated ECU calibration. Use the related-complaint feed below to read raw owner narratives before deciding whether any pattern here affects your specific use case.
Total Complaints
6 filings
Crashes Reported
0 reports
Source
NHTSA ODI
Federal complaints database
At or below the fleet median complaint volume.
| Component | Count |
|---|---|
| EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER | 1 |
| STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS | 1 |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE | 1 |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE | 1 |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 1 |
| STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS | 1 |
SUB FRAME STRUCTURALLY WEAKENED BY RUST WHEEL TO PUSH BACK INTO BODY. DEALER CONFIRMED THIS IS A GROWING PROBLEM. *TR
Mileage: 85,000
ATV QUAD HAD SMOKE COMING FROM UNDERNEATH THE SEAT THEN SUDDENLY BURST INTO FLAMES. *MR THE CONSUMER REQUESTED A REFUND FOR THE VEHICLE. (MODEL 250) *SCC *JB
AUTOMATIC CAM CHAIN TENSIONER STARTING TO FAIL, LEADING TO INCREASED NOISE & WEAR, POSSIBLE FUTURE CATASTROPHIC FAILURE. CONVERSATIONS WITH OTHER OWNERS OF THIS MODEL INDICATES THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM, WHICH SUZUKI DOES NOT WISH TO FIX ONCE 1 YEAR VEHICLE WARRANTY IS EXPIRED, EVEN THO' LOW ANNUAL MILEAGE ON RECREATIONAL VEHICLES MEANS THE ENGINE IS STILL "NEW" WHEN THIS PROBLEM DEVELOPS. SUZUKI HAS SUPERSEDED THE DEFECTIVE PART WITH A NEW REPLACEMENT IN THEIR PARTS CATALOG, SO THERE IS DEFINITELY A PROBLEM WITH THE ORIGINAL UNIT. I FEEL THIS MATTER BEARS INVESTIGATION FOR A POSSIBLE RECALL ON ALL UNITS SOLD WITH THE SUPERSEDED PART.
I'M EXPERIENCING THE INTERMITTENT CUTOUT AND THROTTLE RESPONSE ISSUE THAT SUZUKI IS ALREADY AWARE OF. *AK
THE A/C FAILED SEVERAL TIMES AND WATER DRIPPED ONTO THE PASSENGERS SIDE FLOORBOARDS FROM UNDER THE GLOVE BOX AREA, SOAKING THE ENTIRE FLOORBOARD AREA
THE A/C FAILED SEVERAL TIMES AND WATER DRIPPED ONTO THE PASSENGERS SIDE FLOORBOARDS FROM UNDER THE GLOVE BOX AREA, SOAKING THE ENTIRE FLOORBOARD AREA
Data as of 2025. Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) complaints database, NHTSA recall campaign API, NHTSA NCAP crash-test ratings, and NHTSA FARS for fatality cross-reference.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.