Total Complaints
16 filings
JAGUAR XJ6 · model year
16 NHTSA complaints, 2 crash reports for this specific cohort.
NHTSA overall rating
Not crash-tested
New Car Assessment Program
The 1992JAGUARXJ6 carries 16 consumer safety complaints in NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation database for this specific model-year cohort. Within that volume, owners reported 2 crashes, 0 fires, 0 injuries, and 0 fatalities. No NCAP 5-star crash-test rating is available for this model year in the federal database.
Component-level analysis is where model-year complaints become actionable: the top complaint category for the 1992 XJ6 is seat belts with 6 filings, followed by vehicle speed control (1) and service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components (1). Concentration in one or two component groups is the classic signature of a systemic defect; a flat distribution usually reflects normal aging, warranty complaints, or isolated build-plant variability.
NHTSA currently has 2 investigation files overlapping the 1992 XJ6. Owners comparing this cohort against neighboring years should pair the counters above with the complaint-by-year trend on the parent model page — a spike in a single year often tracks to a platform refresh, a new transmission supplier, or an updated ECU calibration. Use the related-complaint feed below to read raw owner narratives before deciding whether any pattern here affects your specific use case.
Total Complaints
16 filings
Crashes Reported
2 reports
Source
NHTSA ODI
Federal complaints database
At or below the fleet median complaint volume.
| Component | Count |
|---|---|
| SEAT BELTS | 6 |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 1 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS | 1 |
| WHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS | 1 |
| SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:RECLINER | 1 |
| SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY | 1 |
| SUSPENSION:REAR | 1 |
| FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP | 1 |
| POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE:DIFFERENTIAL UNIT | 1 |
| SEAT BELTS:FRONT:RETRACTOR | 1 |
| FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS | 1 |
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 JAGUAR XJ6. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER SEAT BELTS WOULD NOT RETRACT OR TIGHTEN WHILE IN USE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE TRACKING NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE CURRENT AND THE FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 100,000.
Mileage: 100,000
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 JAGUAR XJ6. THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER FRONT AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT RETRACTORS WERE INOPERATIVE. CONSEQUENTLY THE SEAT BELT CAN NOT BE EXTRACTED FROM THE RETRACTOR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THE SEAT BELT RETRACTOR SYSTEM REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. NO REPAIRS WERE MADE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 130,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 135,000. UPDATED 03/04/10 *BF THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE SEAT BELT RETRACTORS WERE NO LONGER AVAILABLE. ALSO, STATED THE FUEL FEED HOSE WAS DEFECTIVE WHICH CAUSED GAS TO LEAK ONTO THE ENGINE BLOCK. UPDATED 05/20/10.*JB
Mileage: 130,000
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 JAGUAR XJ6. THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER FRONT AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT RETRACTORS WERE INOPERATIVE. CONSEQUENTLY THE SEAT BELT CAN NOT BE EXTRACTED FROM THE RETRACTOR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THE SEAT BELT RETRACTOR SYSTEM REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. NO REPAIRS WERE MADE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 130,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 135,000. UPDATED 03/04/10 *BF THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE SEAT BELT RETRACTORS WERE NO LONGER AVAILABLE. ALSO, STATED THE FUEL FEED HOSE WAS DEFECTIVE WHICH CAUSED GAS TO LEAK ONTO THE ENGINE BLOCK. UPDATED 05/20/10.*JB
Mileage: 130,000
AS WARRANTY ITEM, DEALER REPAIRED BROKEN PASSENGER SIDE MOTORIZED SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. HOWEVER, DEALER REFUSED TO REPAIR UNDER WARRANTY THE BROKEN SEAT BELT BUCKLE THAT ATTACHED TO MOTORIZED ASSEMBLY. REQUESTED $330 FOR REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. BELIEVE THIS IS ATTEMPT BY MFG TO CIRCUMVENT SPIRIT OF NOT THE LETTER OF RESTRAINT SYSTEM REGS, AS SEAT BELT SYSTEM IS ONLY AS RELIABLE AS WEAKEST COMPONENT, IN THIS CASE A NON-FUNCTIONING BUCKLE. LIKE THE MOTORIZED BELTS, THE BUCKLE SHOULD BE A LIFETIME WARRANTY ITEM IF THE REGS ARE TO HAVE MEANING. *AK *JB ******DIMS 11 IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12/12/02 CUT-OVER TO ARTEMIS*****770288.
Mileage: 79,200
NO SUMMARY. DT
FUEL PUMP CONNECTORS INSIDE FUEL TANK MALFUNCTIONED, CAUSING VEHICLE TO SHUTDOWN WHEN EVER CONSUMER WAS DRIVING. CONTACTED DEALER, AND DEALER WAS NOT WILLING TO DO ANYTHING.*AK
PASSIVE RESTRAINT MORTOR BELT MALFUNCTIONED.
HEAD PREVIOUSLY (8/13/01) REPORTED TO YOU THE REFUSAL OF THE DEALER/MFG. TO REPLACE AN INOPERATIVE SEAT BELT BUCKLE THAT IS PART OF THE PASSIVE MOTORIZED SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY . REQUESTED $330 TO REPAIR/REPLACE. BY COINCIDENCE, THE BUCKLE ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE ASSEMBLY FAILED IN EXACTLY THE SAME WAY ONLY HOURS AFTER INITIAL REPORT FILED. WHILE BOTH BUCKLES CAN BE CONNECTED, THEY CANNOT EASILYT BE REMOVED, AND REPRESENT A DANGEROUS SAFETY HAZARD IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH. EXITING THE VEHICLE WOULD BE MORE DIFFICULT. BELIEVE THAT REPAIR/REPLACEMENT OF BUCKLES COULD BE COVERED AS PART OF LIFETIME WARRANTY OF VEHICLE RESTRAINT SYSTEM. REFUSAL TO COVER AS WARRANTY ITEM IS AGAINST SPIRIT AND INTENT OF VEHICLE SAFETY REGULATIONS.
TOOK MY VEHICLE TO THE LOCAL DEALER TO REPAIR THE PASSENGER-SIDE PASSIVE MOTORIZED SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. DEALER REPAIRED UNDER WARRANTY, BUT REFUSED TO REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE SEAT BELT BUCKLE THAT CONNECTS TO THE ASSEMBLY. REQUESTED $330 FOR REPAIR. SINCE SYSTEM IS NOT FULLY OPERATIVE WITH DEFECTIVE BUCKLE, BELIEVE THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT THE VEHICLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. IT VIOLATES THE SPIRIT, IF NOT THE LETTER, OF THE SAFETY REGULATIONS. AM CONCERNED THAT INOPERATIVE BUCKLE COULD BE A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD IN EVENT OF CRASH, AS IT WOULD MAKE EXIT FROM VEHICLE DIFFICULT. MFG. SHOULD REPLACE FAULTY BUCKLE AS PART OF LIFETIME WARRANTY ON RESTRAINT SYSTEM.
PASSENGER'S SIDE SEATBELT WILL INTERMITTENTLY STAY IN LOCKING POSITION AND FINALLY IT WILL RELEASE. *AK
REAR SUSPENSION IS GONE. VEHICLE BOUNCES AROUND SIGNIFICANTLY. DEALER RECOMMENDS REPLACEMENT WITH REAR END KIT. *AK
DRIVER AND PASSENGER SEATBELTS LITTLE RED BUCKLE WHICH STATES "PRESS" BROKE, WHICH THE OCCUPANT MAY BUCKLE THE SEATBELT IN, BUT NOT ABLE TO RELEASE APPROPIATELY. *AK
DRIVER SIDE SEATBACK JAMMED INTO THE RECLINING POSITION. DEALER HAS BEEN CONTACTED. *AK
THE WHEEL LUGS: NUTS THAT SECURE THE BOLTS TO THE REAR WHEEL ARE BEGINNING TO DISCONNECT. *AK
SUDDEN RAPID ACCELERATION, RESULTING IN LOSS OF CONTROL/ACCIDENT. *AK
BRAKES FAILED DURING ABOVE ACCIDENT. TT
Data as of 2025. Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) complaints database, NHTSA recall campaign API, NHTSA NCAP crash-test ratings, and NHTSA FARS for fatality cross-reference.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.