MAZDA CX-9 vs MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER

The MAZDA CX-9 (2007–2023, 17 model years) carries 1,785 NHTSA consumer complaints and 14 safety recalls, while the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER (2003–2025, 22 model years) carries 1,776 complaints and 40 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 88 vs 186 crashes, 15 vs 20 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the MAZDA CX-9, the leading complaint category is service brakes (411 filings), followed by engine and power train. For the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER, it is power train (160), ahead of suspension and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the MAZDA CX-9 an average 4.7/5 crash-test rating versus 4.3/5 for the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.