Comparison

MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER vs VOLVO WAH

Side-by-side comparison of the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER and VOLVO WAH drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER (2003–2025) and the VOLVO WAH (1999–2000), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER (2003–2025, 22 model years) carries 1,776 NHTSA consumer complaints and 40 safety recalls, while the VOLVO WAH (1999–2000, 2 model years) carries 4 complaints and 2 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 186 vs 0 crashes, 20 vs 0 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER, the leading complaint category is power train (160 filings), followed by suspension and electrical system. For the VOLVO WAH, it is power train:driveline (2), ahead of suspension and service brakes, air:supply. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER vs VOLVO WAH - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER Metric VOLVO WAH
4.3/5 Avg Safety Rating N/A
1,776 Total Complaints 4
40 Total Recalls 2
186 Crashes Reported 0
20 Fires Reported 0
141 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
22 years Years on Market 2 years

Top Complaint Categories

POWER TRAIN
160
0
SUSPENSION
146
1
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
142
0
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
139
0
ENGINE
127
0
POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE
0
2
SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:SUPPLY
0
1
MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER VOLVO WAH

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER or VOLVO WAH?
MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER has 1,776 total NHTSA complaints with 186 crashes, while VOLVO WAH has 4 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER have compared to VOLVO WAH?
MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER has 40 recalls across 22 model years, while VOLVO WAH has 2 recalls across 2 model years.
What are the most common problems with MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER?
The most commonly reported issues for MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER are: POWER TRAIN (160 complaints), SUSPENSION (146 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (142 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (139 complaints), ENGINE (127 complaints).
What are the most common problems with VOLVO WAH?
The most commonly reported issues for VOLVO WAH are: POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE (2 complaints), SUSPENSION (1 complaints), SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:SUPPLY (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data