WORKHORSE W22 · model year

2003 WORKHORSE W22

130 NHTSA complaints, 1 crash report, and 1 active recall for this specific cohort.

NHTSA overall rating

Not crash-tested

New Car Assessment Program

The 2003WORKHORSEW22 carries 130 consumer safety complaints in NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation database for this specific model-year cohort. Within that volume, owners reported 1 crash, 10 fires, 0 injuries, and 0 fatalities. No NCAP 5-star crash-test rating is available for this model year in the federal database.

Component-level analysis is where model-year complaints become actionable: the top complaint category for the 2003 W22 is service brakes, hydraulic with 97 filings, followed by service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:disc:caliper (5) and service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip (3). Concentration in one or two component groups is the classic signature of a systemic defect; a flat distribution usually reflects normal aging, warranty complaints, or isolated build-plant variability. This model year has 1 active recall campaign, which means the manufacturer is obligated to remedy the covered defect at no charge for the life of the vehicle — the full NHTSA campaign numbers are listed below.

NHTSA currently has 2 investigation files overlapping the 2003 W22. Owners comparing this cohort against neighboring years should pair the counters above with the complaint-by-year trend on the parent model page — a spike in a single year often tracks to a platform refresh, a new transmission supplier, or an updated ECU calibration. Use the related-complaint feed below to read raw owner narratives before deciding whether any pattern here affects your specific use case.

130
Complaints
1
Crashes
10
Fires
0
Injuries
0
Deaths

Total Complaints

130 filings

Crashes Reported

1 reports

Source

NHTSA ODI

Federal complaints database

Complaints vs. fleet median (215)

At or below the fleet median complaint volume.

Complaints by Component

ComponentCount
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC97
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:CALIPER5
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP3
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR2
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS2
SERVICE BRAKES, ELECTRIC2
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP2
SERVICE BRAKES2
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP:CONTROL UNIT/MODULE1
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP:ABS WARNING LIGHT1
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS1
EQUIPMENT1
STEERING1
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP:WHEEL SPEED SENSOR/TONE RING1
SUSPENSION:FRONT:WHEEL BEARING1

Recalls (1)

09V11000003/04/2009

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

NAVISTAR IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR MY 2001-2008 WORKHORSE W20, W21 AND W22 CHASSIS AND CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2009 THROUGH 2011 MONACO RV ADMIRAL, ARISTA, MONARCH, AND RIPTIDE RECREATIONAL VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH AXLES THAT INCLUDE BOSCH ZOPS OR ZOHT PIN SLIDE HYDRAULIC DISC BRAKES. WHEN COMBINED W

Recent Complaints

20220114FireSERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

The contact owns a 2003 Workhorse W22. The contact stated that upon stopping the motorhome in her driveway, her husband discovered a bluish-black color smoke emitting from underneath the vehicle. The rear passenger side brake caliper had caught fire and the contact's husband was able to extinguish the fire with a water hose. The fire department was not called and a report was not filed. The contact stated that the brake and ABS warning lights had illuminated on the instrument panel after the failure. The contact's husband took pictures of the damage and showed them to an independent mechanic. The mechanic then informed the contact's husband of NHTSA Campaign Number: 09V110000(SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC) which he linked to the failure. The mechanic contacted then notified the manufacturer of the failure but received no assistance. The contact also made multiple attempts to reach the manufacturer but had no success. The vehicle had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was approximately

Mileage: 54,000

20180714SERVICE BRAKES

NAVISTAR IS RECALLING.....THERE'S A RECALL TO REPLACE ALL FOUR CALIPERS BUT THEY WON'T REPLACE THE ROTORS ALL FOUR OF THEM ARE CRACKED FROM OVERHEATING BECAUSE OF THE CALIPERS HANGING UP . THIS RECALL IS FOR A WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS.

20160625SERVICE BRAKES

REAR CALIPERS WERE REPLACED ON RECALL WITH REBUILT CALIPERS. AFTER LESS THAN 500 MILES THE RIGHT REAR CALIPER BLEW OUT ALL BRAKE FLUID RESULTING IN COMPLETE LOSS OF BRAKES. THIS HAPPENED 40 MILES FROM HOME ON A STATE ROAD.

Mileage: 39,625

20111222SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20111222ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:EXHAUST SYSTEM:EMISSION CONTROL:CATALYTIC CONVERTOR

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20111222FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20111222ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE:BELTS AND ASSOCIATED PULLEYS

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20111222ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: INSTRUMENT CLUSTER/PANEL

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20111222EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TURN SIGNAL:SWITCH

2003 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE MOTORHOME ON A 2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO WORKHORSE BRAKE SYSTEM RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN MAY OF 2009, HE RECEIVED AN INTERIM NOTICE WARNING ABOUT A POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH THE WORKHORSE SYSTEM. THE NOTICED STATED THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF THE BRAKES STICKING, BURNING AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATING. IT FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE SYMPTOMS SHOULD APPEAR, THAT THE DRIVER SHOULD PULL OVER AND EXAMINE THE WHEELS FOR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND CONTACT A WORKHORSE SERVICE CENTER. IN JUNE 2009 THE CONSUMER WAS ABOUT 100 MILES INTO HIS TRIP, WHEN HE EXPERIENCED OVER HEATING OF THE BRAKES AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED. HE PULLED OVER AND CALLED THE NUMBER LISTED ON THE RECALL. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE TO HAVE THE RV TOWED TO A SERVICE CENTER, THE SERVICE CENTER MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO THE RV AND FOUND THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL ON THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, WHICH WAS ALSO REPLACED. IN JANUARY 2010, THE CONSUMER BEGAN TO NOTICE A SLIGHT LOSS

20110526SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES TO INQUIRE ABOUT RECALLS *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE LIGHT ILLUMINATED TWICE AND THE REPAIR SHOP REPLACED THE WHEEL SENSORS. ALSO, THE FRONT BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS WERE REPLACED. THE CONSUMER STATED HE RECEIVED A PENDING RECALL NOTICE FOR THE BRAKES. HE CONTACTED THE DEALER TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT, BUT WAS INFORMED IT WOULD BE MONTHS BEFORE THE REPAIRS COULD BE MADE. *JB

20110524SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 WORKHORSE HORSE CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN RESPONSE TO A DENIAL OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF CALIPER ASSEMBLY. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED ALL OF THE REPAIRS MADE FROM SEPT 2007 THROUGH JULY 2008 PRIOR TO AN SAFETY RECALL NOTICES FROM WORKHORSE. ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2007, BOTH FRONT WHEEL SEALS WERE LEAKING AND HAD TO BE REPLACED. WORKHORSE DENIED THE CLAIM, BECAUSE THEY WERE ONLY CONSIDERING REPAIRS MADE AFTER NOVEMBER 16, 2007 FOR REIMBURSEMENT. ON A SEPARATE OCCASION, WHILE ENROUTE TO HIS SUMMER HOME, THERE WAS A BURNING ODOR AND SMOKE COMING FROM THE WHEEL. THE MECHANIC REMOVED THE BURNED ABS SENSOR AND REPLACED THE HUB CAPS AND SEALS. *JB

20110311SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES REGARDING WORKHORSE WARRANTY AND SAFETY RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED BRAKE PROBLEMS WHILE ON A TRIP. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED BY THREE DEALERS THAT IT WOULD BE SEVERAL WEEKS BEFORE HE COULD RECEIVE SERVICE. THE CONSUMER FINALLY FOUND A SERVICE CENTER AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEK. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED HE WAS CHARGED FOR REPAIRS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN COVERED IN THE RECALL. HE LEARNED THE PROBLEM WITH THE ABS AND EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHTS WAS A PROBLEM THAT OCCASIONALLY OCCURRED WHEN THE RECALL WORK WAS PERFORMED. THE CONSUMER IS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE ABS, EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHTS AND BUZZER NOT GOING OUT. *JB

20110310SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO BAD BRAKES *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED HE/SHE FIRST EXPERIENCED FRONT BRAKE FAILURE IN SEPT 2007. THE FRONT BRAKES LOCKED UP WHICH CAUSED THE BRAKES TO OVERHEAT. THE FRONT CALIPERS, BRAKE PADS, FRONT INNER SEALS, FRONT OUTER HUB COVERS AND ROTORS HAD TO BE REPLACED. ALSO, THE RIGHT FRONT WHEEL SPEED SENSOR WAS DEFECTIVE AND HAD TO BE REPLACED AS WELL . THE SECOND TIME WAS IN APRIL 2008 WHEN THE REAR CALIPERS SEIZED AND DAMAGED THE ROTORS AND PADS. THE BRAKES WERE REPLACED UNDER AN EXTENDED WARRANTY. THE CONSUMER STATED HE/SHE RECEIVED A REFUND CHECK FOR THE REAR BRAKES ONLY. THE CONSUMER STATED SINCE A RECALL WAS ISSUED, ALL OF HIS/HER MONEY SHOULD BE REFUNDED INCLUDING MONEY FOR THE COMPONENTS THAT WERE DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF THE FAILED BRAKES. *JB

20110218SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

SAFETY RECALL 51101-C. BRAKE CALIPERS FAILED AND BURNED UP THE ENTIRE BRAKING AND ABS SYSTEM. WORKHORSE IS REFUSING TO PAY $4,600 CASH I PAID TO REPAIR THE DAMAGE

Mileage: 37,500

20110126ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 ALEGRO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE WITH A WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. THE LIQUID SCREEN CRYSTAL DISPLAY FAILED, HE WAS NOT ABLE TO READ THE MILEAGE, SPEED, GEAR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION ON THE SCREEN. THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 24,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 28,669.

Mileage: 24,000

20110120SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO SAFETY RECALL 51101-C WORKHORSE CUSTOM CHASSIS BOSCH BRAKE CALIPER *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE APPLIED THE BRAKE GENTLY TO STOP FOR TRAFFIC, THE RIGHT FRONT BRAKE LOCKED UP AND WOULD NOT RELEASE. HE DROVE SLOWLY ALMOST AT FULL THROTTLE TO THE CAMPGROUND WITH SMOKE EMITTING FROM THE WHEEL BEARING. THE BRAKE ROTOR, CALIPER AND ABS SENSOR HAD TO BE REPLACED. WORKHORSE STATED THE CONSUMER WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT AS THE REPAIRS WERE NOT MADE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 16, 2007 AND JUNE 15, 2009. *JB

20110120SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

2003 RV. ATTORNEY WRITES ON BEHALF OF CONSUMERS REGARDING FAULTY BRAKES AND RECALL. *TGW AN INSPECTION OF THE RV REVEALED EXTREME CRACKING DAMAGE HAD BEEN CAUSED TO THE ROTORS WHICH WAS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE FAULTY BRAKE CALIPERS. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT THE RECALL DID NOT COVER ADDITIONAL DAMAGE THAT HAD BEEN CAUSED TO THE ROTORS BY THE FAULTY CALIPERS. THE CONSUMER HAD TO PAY FOR THE ROTORS, PADS AND BRAKE LINES. ALSO, THE ABS WAS SERVICED TWICE PRIOR TO THE RECALL. *JB

20110114SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 WORKHORSE W22. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS BEING SERVICED FOR REPAIRS UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC) WHEN HE WAS INFORMED BY THE TECHNICIAN THAT ALL FOUR ROTORS WERE FRACTURED AND THE VEHICLE WAS DEEMED AS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND ADVISED THE CONTACT THAT THE FAILURE WAS COMMON AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO PROVIDE ANY ASSISTANCE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 50,983. UPDATED 03/15/11 *BF UPDATED 06/03/11

Mileage: 50,983

20110112SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 WORKHORSE W-22. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR RECALL 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC). THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED ACCORDING TO THE RECALL AND THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE ROTORS HAD CRACKED DUE TO THE HEAT GENERATED FROM THE FAILED CALIPERS. THE DEALER STATED THAT EVEN THOUGH THE ROTORS WERE A PART OF THE BRAKING SYSTEM, THEY WOULD NOT BE REPAIRED UNDER THE RECALL. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 42,000.

Mileage: 42,000

20101223SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

CONSUMER WRITES REGARDING SAFETY RECALL 51101-C INVOLVING THE BOSCH SERVICE BRAKE CALIPER *TGW THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKES WHILE ON A TRIP. WHEN THE CONSUMER ARRIVED AT THE DEALER, HE WAS INFORMED IT WOULD BE SEVERAL WEEKS BEFORE SERVICES COULD BE PERFORMED. THE CONSUMER THEN DECIDED TO SCHEDULED AN APPOINTMENT AT ANOTHER ESTABLISHMENT. THE REPAIR WAS SHOP WAS ABLE TO FINISH THE BRAKE RECALL WORK. HOWEVER, THEY WERE UNABLE TO GET THE ABS AND EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHT AS WELL AS THE WARNING BUZZER TO OUT. THE NEXT DAY, THE REPAIR SHOP WAS ABLE TO RECTIFY THE PROBLEM. THE CONSUMER WAS CHARGE FOR THAT REPAIR. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AS WELL. *JB

Compare 2003WORKHORSEW22 to Similar Vehicles

NHTSA Investigations

Frequently Asked Questions

How many complaints does the 2003 WORKHORSE W22 have?
The 2003 WORKHORSE W22 has 130 NHTSA complaints, 1 crashes, 10 fires, 0 injuries, and 0 deaths reported.
Are there any recalls for the 2003 WORKHORSE W22?
Yes, the 2003 WORKHORSE W22 has 1 recall(s). The most common affected component is SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC. Recalls are issued by NHTSA and manufacturers must provide a free remedy.
What are the most common problems with the 2003 WORKHORSE W22?
The most-complained component for the 2003 WORKHORSE W22 is SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC with 97 complaints. Other frequently reported areas include SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:CALIPER and SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP.
Is the 2003 WORKHORSE W22 safe to buy?
Review the complaint history, crash and fire reports, safety ratings, and recall status on this page to make an informed decision. No NHTSA crash test rating is available for this model year. Compare with other model years using the links above.
Where does this data come from?
All complaint, recall, and safety rating data is sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Complaints are filed by vehicle owners through NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation.

Vehicle Safety Guides

Data as of 2025. Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) complaints database, NHTSA recall campaign API, NHTSA NCAP crash-test ratings, and NHTSA FARS for fatality cross-reference.