MERCEDES-BENZ C230 · model year

1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230

54 NHTSA complaints, 1 crash report for this specific cohort.

NHTSA overall rating

Not crash-tested

New Car Assessment Program

The 1998MERCEDES-BENZC230 carries 54 consumer safety complaints in NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation database for this specific model-year cohort. Within that volume, owners reported 1 crash, 0 fires, 3 injuries, and 0 fatalities. No NCAP 5-star crash-test rating is available for this model year in the federal database.

Component-level analysis is where model-year complaints become actionable: the top complaint category for the 1998 C230 is electrical system:12v/24v/48v battery with 7 filings, followed by fuel system, other (3) and suspension:front (3). Concentration in one or two component groups is the classic signature of a systemic defect; a flat distribution usually reflects normal aging, warranty complaints, or isolated build-plant variability.

NHTSA currently has 15 investigation files overlapping the 1998 C230. Owners comparing this cohort against neighboring years should pair the counters above with the complaint-by-year trend on the parent model page — a spike in a single year often tracks to a platform refresh, a new transmission supplier, or an updated ECU calibration. Use the related-complaint feed below to read raw owner narratives before deciding whether any pattern here affects your specific use case.

54
Complaints
1
Crashes
0
Fires
3
Injuries
0
Deaths

Total Complaints

54 filings

Crashes Reported

1 reports

Source

NHTSA ODI

Federal complaints database

Complaints vs. fleet median (215)

At or below the fleet median complaint volume.

Complaints by Component

ComponentCount
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY7
FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER3
SUSPENSION:FRONT3
SUSPENSION3
VISIBILITY:REARVIEW MIRRORS/DEVICES:EXTERIOR2
STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR2
VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS2
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL2
SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:ANTILOCK2
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY2
EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER2
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM2
SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS2
STRUCTURE:BODY2
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING2

Recent Complaints

20150908SUSPENSION

ON 09/06/2015 @ APPROX. 1:30 P.M., MY WIFE, SELF, AND GRANDCHILDREN WERE TRAVELING HOME FROM OUR GRANDSONS FIRST JFL FOOTBALL GAME FOR THE SEASON. AFTER INSPECTING THE SUSPENSION I NOTICED THAT THE COIL SPRING WAS FULLY EXPANDED AND ARCHED OUTWARD BADLY. FURTHER INSPECTION NOTICED THAT THE UPPER COIL SPRING CUP/MOUNT HAD RUSTED AWAY AND ALLOWED THE FRONT END TO DROP, FLATTENING THE SUSPENSION ALLOWING THE WEIGHT OF THE BODY TO REST UPON THE LOWER CONTROL ARM. I DID SOME RESEARCH TO FIND ANY INFORMATION THAT I COULD TO HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHAT JUST HAPPENED. MY SEARCH GATHERED ME ALL KINDS OF OWNERS WHO WERE ANGERED THAT THERE IS NOT A RECALL FOR SUCH A MAJOR PART THAT IS WELDED TO THE BODY AND RUSTS AWAY IN MAN Y INCIDENCES. MERCEDES BENZ WILL NOT WARRANTY THIS PROBLEM. MANY HAVE STATED THE POSSIBILITIES OF MANY ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE INJURED AND/OR HAVE KILLED THOUSANDS YET IF THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE WELDS OR RUSTED INSULATED WELDS, NO ONE WOULD THINK T

Mileage: 201,000

20140916VISIBILITY/WIPER

THE WASHER FLUID RESERVOIR LEAKS AND MUST BE REPLACED. MERCEDES-BENZ CHOSE TO CHARGE $282.98 FOR THIS REPLACEMENT FOR PARTS AND LABOR. THE PART SEEMS OBVIOUSLY DEFECTIVE. WHEN THE CAR IS MOVING, THIS DEFECT CAN PREVENT THE WINDSHIELD FROM BEING CLEARED, AND CAUSE ACCIDENTS AND DEATH. MERCEDES-BENZ CARS WITH THE DEFECTIVE PART NUMBER MUST BE RECALLED. *TR

Mileage: 18,562

20140811FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING DOWNHILL AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE VEHICLE STALLED AND THE INSTRUMENT PANEL ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ALSO DISCOVERED A FUEL LEAK AND HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO A LOCAL MECHANIC. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 150,000.

Mileage: 150,000

20140610SUSPENSION

I WAS SITTING STOPPED IN TRAFFIC WITH THE ENGINE OFF, AND THE FRONT DRIVERS' SIDE OF MY VEHICLE JUST SPONTANEOUSLY DROPPED AS IF THAT PART OF THE VEHICLE HAD FALLEN INTO A SINK HOLE. I WAS WAITING FOR A DRAW BRIDGE TO COME DOWN AFTER A SAILBOAT PASSED, SO THE CAR WAS TURNED OFF. WHEN I GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE TO INSPECT WHAT HAD HAPPENED, I COULD SEE THAT THE FRONT SPRING HAD SEPARATED FROM ITS TOP MOUNT IN WHAT I ASSUME WAS THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE. WHEN I SEARCHED ON-LINE I FOUND THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME WITH VARIOUS MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ. IF I HAD BEEN DRIVING AT HIGHWAY SPEED I AND ANYONE ELSE IN THE CAR COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN KILLED, NOT TO MENTION OTHER VEHICLES, SINCE THE VEHICLE STEERING IS ALSO COMPROMISED WITH THE WHEEL BOTTOMING-OUT ON THE INSIDE OF THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE CAR IS A '98, BUT WITH ONLY 148,000, THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. CLEARLY IT'S A DESIGN FLAW. WHY DOES NHTSA LET MERCEDES BENZ GET AWAY WITH THIS WITHOUT DEMANDING A RECALL

Mileage: 148,000

20140610STEERING

I WAS SITTING STOPPED IN TRAFFIC WITH THE ENGINE OFF, AND THE FRONT DRIVERS' SIDE OF MY VEHICLE JUST SPONTANEOUSLY DROPPED AS IF THAT PART OF THE VEHICLE HAD FALLEN INTO A SINK HOLE. I WAS WAITING FOR A DRAW BRIDGE TO COME DOWN AFTER A SAILBOAT PASSED, SO THE CAR WAS TURNED OFF. WHEN I GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE TO INSPECT WHAT HAD HAPPENED, I COULD SEE THAT THE FRONT SPRING HAD SEPARATED FROM ITS TOP MOUNT IN WHAT I ASSUME WAS THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE. WHEN I SEARCHED ON-LINE I FOUND THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME WITH VARIOUS MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ. IF I HAD BEEN DRIVING AT HIGHWAY SPEED I AND ANYONE ELSE IN THE CAR COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN KILLED, NOT TO MENTION OTHER VEHICLES, SINCE THE VEHICLE STEERING IS ALSO COMPROMISED WITH THE WHEEL BOTTOMING-OUT ON THE INSIDE OF THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE CAR IS A '98, BUT WITH ONLY 148,000, THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. CLEARLY IT'S A DESIGN FLAW. WHY DOES NHTSA LET MERCEDES BENZ GET AWAY WITH THIS WITHOUT DEMANDING A RECALL

Mileage: 148,000

20121226SUSPENSION

I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND NOTICED THE FRONT END DROP AND THE CAR WAS NOT HANDLING RIGHT. I DROVE THE CAR TO THE REPAIR SHOP AND HAD ASKED THEM TO LOOK AT THE SHOCKS. THAT'S WHEN I WAS INFORMED THAT THE COIL SPRING MOUNT WAS CRACKED AND WAS SEPARATING FROM THE FRAME, I WAS ALSO INFORMED THE PASSENGER SIDE WAS NOT MUCH BETTER... THEY SAID IT WAS DUE TO A RUST ISSUE ALTHOUGH THE CAR WAS STORED WINTERS. VERY DISAPPOINTING.. I WILL ATTEMPT TO HAVE THIS REPAIR COST COVERED BY MERCEDES IF NOT AFTER READING THE OTHER COMPLAINTS, I WILL NEVER PURCHASE ANOTHER MERCEDES..NOR WILL I ALLOW ANYONE ELSE I KNOW MAKE THIS MISTAKE. *TR

Mileage: 110,000

20110317CrashSTRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

MY LEFT FRONT SPRING PERCH RUSTED OFF THE FRAME AND MY FRONT WHEEL CAME OFF THE CAR AS I WAS DRIVING. THE RIGHT PERCH WAS RUSTED AND IT HAD TO BE REPAIRED ALSO. *TR

Mileage: 149,000

20101110STRUCTURE:BODY

RIGHT AND LEFT SPRING PERCHES ARE RUSTING OUT AND COMING APART ON A 1998 230 C MERCEDES. PERCHES HAVE TO BE REWELDED SO FRONT WHEELS DON'T COME OFF THE CAR. *TR

Mileage: 150,000

20091029ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. THE VEHICLE WILL STALL WITHOUT ANY PRIOR WARNINGS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL REPAIR FACILITY, AND THE CRANK SHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS REPLACED, THE REPAIR DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO THE DEALER, BUT THE TECHNICIANS COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 121,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 122,748.

Mileage: 122,748

20091029ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE WOULD STALL WITHOUT ANY WARNINGS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL REPAIR FACILITY, AND THE CRANK SHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS REPLACED. THE REPAIR DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, BUT THE TECHNICIAN COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. HE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 121,000 . THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 122,748.

Mileage: 122,748

20090930SUSPENSION:FRONT

THE DRIVER'S SIDE UPPER COIL-SPRING MOUNT TORE AWAY FROM THE BODY STRUCTURE, EJECTING THE COIL SPRING AND BUSHING, COLLAPSING THE FRONT SUSPENSION AND RENDERING THE CAR IMMOBILE. THE CAR WAS PARKED AT THE TIME SO NO COLLISION. IF THE CAR WAS MOVING AT THE TIME OF THE FAILURE THERE WOULD BE NO WAY TO STEER IT. DUE TO ESTIMATED REPAIR COST OF $1500-2000 VERSUS RESALE VALUE, THE CAR WAS SOLD AS-IS AND TOWED AWAY. *TR

Mileage: 149,000

20090930STRUCTURE:BODY

THE DRIVER'S SIDE UPPER COIL-SPRING MOUNT TORE AWAY FROM THE BODY STRUCTURE, EJECTING THE COIL SPRING AND BUSHING, COLLAPSING THE FRONT SUSPENSION AND RENDERING THE CAR IMMOBILE. THE CAR WAS PARKED AT THE TIME SO NO COLLISION. IF THE CAR WAS MOVING AT THE TIME OF THE FAILURE THERE WOULD BE NO WAY TO STEER IT. DUE TO ESTIMATED REPAIR COST OF $1500-2000 VERSUS RESALE VALUE, THE CAR WAS SOLD AS-IS AND TOWED AWAY. *TR

Mileage: 149,000

20090603TIRES

ON 6/2/09, I REMOVED MY OLD WHEEL FROM MY 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230 PRIOR TO TRADING IT FOR ANOTHER VEHICLE. I POSTED THE CUSTOM WHEELS AND TIRES (YOKOHAMA YK520) THAT I PURCHASED FROM DISCOUNT TIRES. I MET WITH A GENTLEMAN WHO WAS INTERESTED IN PURCHASING THE TIRES, BUT CAREFULLY INSPECTED THEM AND FOUND HAIRLINE CRACKS ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE WALL OF ALL 4 TIRES. THIS WAS ENOUGH FOR HIM TO CHANGE HIS MIND AND NOT MAKE THE PURCHASE. I THEN BECAME SUSPICIOUS AND AFRAID THAT MY FAMILY LIFE COULD HAVE BEEN AT RISK AND MANY OTHER FAMILIES OUT ON ROADS ACROSS THIS COUNTRY AND ELSEWHERE. ON 6/3/09, I CONTACTED DISCOUNT TIRES AND BROUGHT THE COMPLETE WHEEL AND TIRES FOR AN INSPECTION AND POSSIBLY REPLACEMENT. DISCOUNT TIRES STATED THAT THE TIRES ARE A SAFETY HAZARD, BUT WOULD ONLY PRORATE THE TIRES AND GIVE ME A PARTIAL CREDIT TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF TIRES. DISCOUNT THEN GAVE A NUMBER TO CONTACT YOKOHOMA TIRES CONSUMER AFFAIRS OFFICE DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS THIS SERIOUS MATTER. I LATER CO

Mileage: 185,000

20080904SUSPENSION:FRONT

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING 10 MPH, THE UPPER SPRING PERCH (WHERE THE COIL SPRING CONNECTED TO THE BODY OF THE VEHICLE) COMPLETELY DISLODGED. THE ENTIRE DRIVER SIDE SUSPENSION COLLAPSED ON THE VEHICLE. HE WAS ABLE TO MANEUVER THE VEHICLE TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND IT WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE SUSPENSION FAILED DUE TO RUST. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE LESS THAN 150,000. UPDATED 11/25/08. *LJ UPDATED 11/25/08. *JB

Mileage: 150,000

20080904SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS

ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 8, 2008, WHILE DRIVING HOME FROM WORK THROUGH A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AT APPROXIMATELY 20-25 MPH. MY LEFT FRONT COIL SPRING FELL COMPLETELY OFF MY CAR! THE FRONT END DROPPED, I TEMPORARILY LOST CONTROL OF THE CAR, AND THE SPRING WENT INTO THE ROAD, CAUSING A ROAD HAZARD FOR ANY ON-COMING VEHICLE (THANKFULLY THERE WERE NONE). I WAS NOTIFIED BY THE MECHANIC AT MY GARAGE THAT THIS IS SOMEWHAT OF A COMMON OCCURRENCE WITH THIS VEHICLE (MERCEDES BENZ C230) AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO GET MERCEDES TO RECALL THE MOUNTING PIECE FOR THIS SPRING (WHICH RUSTED) FOR SOME TIME WITH NO SUCCESS. IS MERCEDES WAITING FOR A FATALITY BEFORE ACCEPTING THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS DEFECT? NO DOUBT IF I HAD BEEN ON THE INTERSTATE TRAVELING AT 55-60 MPH I WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THOSE FATALITIES (AS WELL AS OTHER MOTORISTS IN THE VICINITY). PLEASE POST THIS DEFECT AND TRY TO GET AS MANY MERCEDES OWNERS AS POSSIBLE ACQUAINTED WITH THIS DEFECT SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE THIS MOUNT

Mileage: 58,000

20080812SUSPENSION:FRONT

WHILE DRIVING ON RTE 50 IN VIRGINIA, THE FRONT SPRING HOUSING COLLAPED AND THE COILED SPRING CAME OFF ONTO THE ROAD. THE DEALER SAID IT WAS CAUSED BY METAL FATIGUE OF THE BRACE THAT HOLDS THE SPRINGS ONTO THE FRAME. IT WAS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION AS THE CAR HAD TO BE DRIVEN TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD IMMEDIATELY. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT THIS HAPPENED TO THE VEHICLE, THOUGH THE REPAIRER SAID THAT THIS HAS HAPPENED PREVIOUSLY ON MECREDES BENZES AND THAT THERE WAS A RECALL IN CANADA FOR THIS SAME DEFECT. THE CAR WAS REPAIRED - TWO NEW BRACES WERE WELDED TO THE FRAME AND SHOCKS WERE REPLACED THAT WERE DAMAGED DUE TO THE DEFECT.

Mileage: 133,000

20070725SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT SUSPENSION ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE COIL SPRINGS HAS FAILED. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE SERVICED AND THE TECHNICIAN CONFIRMED THE FAILURE. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER HAVE NOT YET BEEN NOTIFIED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE COIL SPRINGS WERE REPLACED DUE TO THE SEVERE SAFETY CONCERN. HE HAS THE DEFECTIVE COIL SPRINGS FOR PROOF. THE COST OF THE REPAIRS WAS $434. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 68,000.

Mileage: 68,000

20051030ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

ONE MORNING CAR STARTED NORMAL BUT RPMS WERE HI WHILE IN PARK AND EVER SINCE THE CAR DROVE ROUGH, STALLING AT LIGHTS, DYING WHEN ACCELERATION WAS PRESSES. CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON - OBD READER CODE SAYS MASS FLOW AIR SENSOR FAILURE. REPLACED THE SENSOR, PROBLEM FIXED, AT A COST OF $500 FOR PART! *NM

Mileage: 120,000

20050106ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY

NAR 04/07/2003. * MR THE CONSUMER STATED THE BATTERY STARTED SMOKING AND EMITTING FUMES FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE CONSUMER STATED THERE WAS A RECALL REGARDING THE SAME PROBLEM HE EXPERIENCED. *JB

20041222ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY

01 V 366 000/BATTERY: WHEN THE CONSUMER REMOVED THE BATTERY FROM THE TRUNK AND PLACED IT ON A CRATE TO CHECK THE WATER LEVEL, IT ALL OF A SUDDEN EXPLODED IN THE CONSUMERS FACE. THE CONSUMER SUSTAINED ACID BURNS, CUTS AND BRUISES TO HIS FACE. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOT NOTIFIED. *JB THE CONSUMER STATED THAT HE WAS NOT TOUCHING THE BATTERY AT THE TIME OF EXPLOSION. *TC

Mileage: 70,000

Compare 1998MERCEDES-BENZC230 to Similar Vehicles

NHTSA Investigations

View all investigations

Frequently Asked Questions

How many complaints does the 1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230 have?
The 1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230 has 54 NHTSA complaints, 1 crashes, 0 fires, 3 injuries, and 0 deaths reported.
What are the most common problems with the 1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230?
The most-complained component for the 1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230 is ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY with 7 complaints. Other frequently reported areas include FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER and SUSPENSION:FRONT.
Is the 1998 MERCEDES-BENZ C230 safe to buy?
Review the complaint history, crash and fire reports, safety ratings, and recall status on this page to make an informed decision. No NHTSA crash test rating is available for this model year. Compare with other model years using the links above.
Where does this data come from?
All complaint, recall, and safety rating data is sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Complaints are filed by vehicle owners through NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation.

Vehicle Safety Guides

Data as of 2025. Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) complaints database, NHTSA recall campaign API, NHTSA NCAP crash-test ratings, and NHTSA FARS for fatality cross-reference.