Investigations

Recall Administration Concerns

NHTSA Audit Query AQ18003 - closed, opened 2018-07-19.

AQ18003 Audit Query Closed

NHTSA investigation AQ18003 is a Audit Query opened on 2018-07-19 and currently closed. The subject is tracked inside the Office of Defects Investigation queue. Latest activity on this investigation was logged on 2021-12-06 - NHTSA updates that field whenever an Information Request goes out, a supplement is filed, or a status change is recorded in the public docket.

An Audit Query like AQ18003 is how NHTSA checks that manufacturers are meeting their statutory obligations, things like notifying owners, reporting foreign recalls, and tracking remedy completion rates under TREAD and FMVSS requirements.

Investigators summarized the matter as follows: "On September 14, 2017, Diono LLC (Diono) submitted a Part 573 Recall Report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) describing various noncompliances with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVS..." Investigations are the early-warning layer of the federal auto-safety system, sitting upstream of formal recalls and defect orders. Whether this one closes without action or escalates into an Engineering Analysis, the full history stays in the ODI archive so researchers, litigators, and buyers can pull the paper trail at any time.

Status
Closed
Type
Audit Query
Opened
2018-07-19
Latest Activity
2021-12-06

Investigation Summary

On September 14, 2017, Diono LLC (Diono) submitted a Part 573 Recall Report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) describing various noncompliances with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 213 in 519,052 child restraints manufactured by Diono (NHTSA Recall No. 17C-003). On July 19, 2018, NHTSA opened Audit Query (AQ) 18-003 to better understand and evaluate Diono's compliance with its Safety Act obligations. On July 20, 2018, NHTSA sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Diono requesting information as part of its AQ18-003 investigation. NHTSA's inquiry led it to determine that Diono had violated several provisions of the Safety Act, and regulations thereunder. Diono did not dispute that certain violations did occur. Rather, Diono asserted that the principal violations were committed by past employees and prior ownership. Diono represented that a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) formally joined Diono in November 2017, and that since that time, the organization has been overhauled and new policies and processes have been put in place. NHTSA and Diono entered into a Consent Order on January 19, 2021, to resolve AQ18-003. As part of the Consent Order, Diono agreed to pay a civil penalty of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($120,000) and agreed that an additional civil penalty of three hundred eighty thousand dollars ($380,000) (Abeyance Amount) would be deferred and held in abeyance pending Diono's satisfactory completion of the requirements of this Consent Order. Failure to comply with the Safety Act or terms of the Consent Order may result in the Abeyance Amount or portions thereof coming due. In the Consent Order, Diono also agreed to several performance obligations. Diono is required to have a consultant advise and assist Diono to develop a training plan and to train Diono employees on topics such as the Safety Act and regulations. The consultant is also required to conduct an audit of Diono's compliance with the Saf

About This Investigation Type

An Audit Query (AQ) is conducted to verify manufacturer compliance with safety standards and recall requirements.

Data from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Cross-references: NHTSA recall campaign API and NHTSA FARS where fatality records overlap. PlainCars does not rate or recommend vehicles. about how PlainCars sources NHTSA data.