Comparison

SUZUKI GSF1250 vs VOLVO ACL

Side-by-side comparison of the SUZUKI GSF1250 and VOLVO ACL drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the SUZUKI GSF1250 (2007–2007) and the VOLVO ACL (1994–1999), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The SUZUKI GSF1250 (2007–2007, 1 model years) carries 6 NHTSA consumer complaints and 0 safety recalls, while the VOLVO ACL (1994–1999, 3 model years) carries 6 complaints and 0 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 0 vs 0 crashes, 0 vs 0 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the SUZUKI GSF1250, the leading complaint category is fuel system, gasoline (3 filings), followed by structure:motorcycle:kickstand/center stand and power train. For the VOLVO ACL, it is unknown or other (3), ahead of wheels:lugs/nuts/bolts/studs and suspension. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

SUZUKI GSF1250 vs VOLVO ACL - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
SUZUKI GSF1250 Metric VOLVO ACL
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
6 Total Complaints 6
0 Total Recalls 0
0 Crashes Reported 0
0 Fires Reported 0
1 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
1 years Years on Market 3 years

Top Complaint Categories

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
3
0
STRUCTURE:MOTORCYCLE:KICKSTAND/CENTER STAND
1
0
POWER TRAIN
1
0
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:COOLING SYSTEM
1
0
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
0
3
WHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS
0
1
SUSPENSION
0
1
EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER
0
1
SUZUKI GSF1250 VOLVO ACL

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, SUZUKI GSF1250 or VOLVO ACL?
SUZUKI GSF1250 has 6 total NHTSA complaints with 0 crashes, while VOLVO ACL has 6 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does SUZUKI GSF1250 have compared to VOLVO ACL?
SUZUKI GSF1250 has 0 recalls across 1 model years, while VOLVO ACL has 0 recalls across 3 model years.
What are the most common problems with SUZUKI GSF1250?
The most commonly reported issues for SUZUKI GSF1250 are: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE (3 complaints), STRUCTURE:MOTORCYCLE:KICKSTAND/CENTER STAND (1 complaints), POWER TRAIN (1 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:COOLING SYSTEM (1 complaints).
What are the most common problems with VOLVO ACL?
The most commonly reported issues for VOLVO ACL are: UNKNOWN OR OTHER (3 complaints), WHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS (1 complaints), SUSPENSION (1 complaints), EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data