Comparison

STERLING LT9500 vs VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40

Side-by-side comparison of the STERLING LT9500 and VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the STERLING LT9500 (2004–2004) and the VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 (1990–1990), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The STERLING LT9500 (2004–2004, 1 model years) carries 1 NHTSA consumer complaint and 1 safety recall, while the VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 (1990–1990, 1 model years) carries 1 complaint and 0 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 0 vs 0 crashes, 0 vs 0 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the STERLING LT9500, the leading complaint category is fuel system, other:delivery:hoses, lines/piping, and fittings (1 filings). For the VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40, it is service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylinder (1). When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

STERLING LT9500 vs VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
STERLING LT9500 Metric VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
1 Total Complaints 1
1 Total Recalls 0
0 Crashes Reported 0
0 Fires Reported 0
0 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
1 years Years on Market 1 years

Top Complaint Categories

FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS
1
0
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER
0
1
STERLING LT9500 VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, STERLING LT9500 or VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40?
STERLING LT9500 has 1 total NHTSA complaints with 0 crashes, while VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 has 1 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does STERLING LT9500 have compared to VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40?
STERLING LT9500 has 1 recalls across 1 model years, while VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 has 0 recalls across 1 model years.
What are the most common problems with STERLING LT9500?
The most commonly reported issues for STERLING LT9500 are: FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS (1 complaints).
What are the most common problems with VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40?
The most commonly reported issues for VOLVO NO SUCH MODEL YEAR C40 are: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data