Comparison

SAAB 9-7X vs SCION FR-S

Side-by-side comparison of the SAAB 9-7X and SCION FR-S drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the SAAB 9-7X (2005–2009) and the SCION FR-S (2013–2016), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The SAAB 9-7X (2005–2009, 5 model years) carries 237 NHTSA consumer complaints and 4 safety recalls, while the SCION FR-S (2013–2016, 4 model years) carries 235 complaints and 7 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 0 vs 5 crashes, 20 vs 4 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the SAAB 9-7X, the leading complaint category is exterior lighting (47 filings), followed by electrical system and fuel system, gasoline. For the SCION FR-S, it is engine (150), ahead of power train and unknown or other. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

SAAB 9-7X vs SCION FR-S - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
SAAB 9-7X Metric SCION FR-S
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
237 Total Complaints 235
4 Total Recalls 7
0 Crashes Reported 5
20 Fires Reported 4
0 Injuries Reported 1
0 Deaths Reported 0
5 years Years on Market 4 years

Top Complaint Categories

EXTERIOR LIGHTING
47
0
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
43
0
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
37
0
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
11
9
ENGINE
9
150
POWER TRAIN
0
24
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
0
10
STEERING
0
9
SAAB 9-7X SCION FR-S

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, SAAB 9-7X or SCION FR-S?
SAAB 9-7X has 237 total NHTSA complaints with 0 crashes, while SCION FR-S has 235 complaints with 5 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does SAAB 9-7X have compared to SCION FR-S?
SAAB 9-7X has 4 recalls across 5 model years, while SCION FR-S has 7 recalls across 4 model years.
What are the most common problems with SAAB 9-7X?
The most commonly reported issues for SAAB 9-7X are: EXTERIOR LIGHTING (47 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (43 complaints), FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE (37 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (11 complaints), ENGINE (9 complaints).
What are the most common problems with SCION FR-S?
The most commonly reported issues for SCION FR-S are: ENGINE (150 complaints), POWER TRAIN (24 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (10 complaints), STEERING (9 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (9 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data