NISSAN MURANO vs TOYOTA 4RUNNER

The NISSAN MURANO (2003–2026, 24 model years) carries 7,404 NHTSA consumer complaints and 26 safety recalls, while the TOYOTA 4RUNNER (1984–2026, 43 model years) carries 7,638 complaints and 42 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 203 vs 544 crashes, 57 vs 72 fires, and 3 vs 25 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the NISSAN MURANO, the leading complaint category is seats (1306 filings), followed by power train and electrical system. For the TOYOTA 4RUNNER, it is structure:body (1380), ahead of suspension and unknown or other. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the NISSAN MURANO an average 4.6/5 crash-test rating versus 4/5 for the TOYOTA 4RUNNER, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.