Comparison

NISSAN 350Z vs PONTIAC AZTEK

Side-by-side comparison of the NISSAN 350Z and PONTIAC AZTEK drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the NISSAN 350Z (2003–2009) and the PONTIAC AZTEK (2001–2005), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The NISSAN 350Z (2003–2009, 7 model years) carries 815 NHTSA consumer complaints and 5 safety recalls, while the PONTIAC AZTEK (2001–2005, 5 model years) carries 829 complaints and 9 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 42 vs 43 crashes, 6 vs 18 fires, and 1 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the NISSAN 350Z, the leading complaint category is suspension:front (97 filings), followed by tires and air bags. For the PONTIAC AZTEK, it is electrical system (78), ahead of fuel system, gasoline and equipment:appliance:air conditioner. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

NISSAN 350Z vs PONTIAC AZTEK - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
NISSAN 350Z Metric PONTIAC AZTEK
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
815 Total Complaints 829
5 Total Recalls 9
42 Crashes Reported 43
6 Fires Reported 18
32 Injuries Reported 49
1 Deaths Reported 0
7 years Years on Market 5 years

Top Complaint Categories

SUSPENSION:FRONT
97
0
TIRES
94
0
AIR BAGS
76
0
POWER TRAIN:MANUAL TRANSMISSION
58
0
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
52
32
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
0
78
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
0
34
EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER
0
32
NISSAN 350Z PONTIAC AZTEK

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, NISSAN 350Z or PONTIAC AZTEK?
NISSAN 350Z has 815 total NHTSA complaints with 42 crashes, while PONTIAC AZTEK has 829 complaints with 43 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does NISSAN 350Z have compared to PONTIAC AZTEK?
NISSAN 350Z has 5 recalls across 7 model years, while PONTIAC AZTEK has 9 recalls across 5 model years.
What are the most common problems with NISSAN 350Z?
The most commonly reported issues for NISSAN 350Z are: SUSPENSION:FRONT (97 complaints), TIRES (94 complaints), AIR BAGS (76 complaints), POWER TRAIN:MANUAL TRANSMISSION (58 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING (52 complaints).
What are the most common problems with PONTIAC AZTEK?
The most commonly reported issues for PONTIAC AZTEK are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (78 complaints), FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE (34 complaints), EQUIPMENT:APPLIANCE:AIR CONDITIONER (32 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING (32 complaints), SUSPENSION:FRONT:WHEEL BEARING (31 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data