Comparison
MITSUBISHI GALANT vs VOLVO WAH
Side-by-side comparison of the MITSUBISHI GALANT and VOLVO WAH drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,054,142 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles since 1995, as of June 2026. This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the MITSUBISHI GALANT (1986–2012) and the VOLVO WAH (1999–2000), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.
The MITSUBISHI GALANT (1986–2012, 27 model years) carries 2,429 NHTSA consumer complaints and 28 safety recalls, while the VOLVO WAH (1999–2000, 2 model years) carries 4 complaints and 2 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 334 vs 0 crashes, 115 vs 0 fires, and 11 vs 0 reported fatalities.
Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the MITSUBISHI GALANT, the leading complaint category is air bags:frontal (141 filings), followed by power train:automatic transmission and suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint. For the VOLVO WAH, it is power train:driveline (2), ahead of suspension and service brakes, air:supply. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.
Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.
| MITSUBISHI GALANT | Metric | VOLVO WAH |
|---|---|---|
| 0/5 | Avg Safety Rating | N/A |
| 2,429 | Total Complaints | 4 ✔ |
| 28 | Total Recalls | 2 ✔ |
| 334 | Crashes Reported | 0 ✔ |
| 115 | Fires Reported | 0 ✔ |
| 247 | Injuries Reported | 0 ✔ |
| 11 | Deaths Reported | 0 ✔ |
| 27 years ✔ | Years on Market | 2 years |
Top Complaint Categories
Also Compare
Compare MITSUBISHI GALANT with:
Compare VOLVO WAH with:
Compare Another Pair
Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.
Go to Compare Tool →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, MITSUBISHI GALANT or VOLVO WAH?▼
How many recalls does MITSUBISHI GALANT have compared to VOLVO WAH?▼
What are the most common problems with MITSUBISHI GALANT?▼
What are the most common problems with VOLVO WAH?▼
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data