Comparison

MACK MACK vs MERCURY LYNX

Side-by-side comparison of the MACK MACK and MERCURY LYNX drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the MACK MACK (1975–1999) and the MERCURY LYNX (1982–1987), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The MACK MACK (1975–1999, 16 model years) carries 35 NHTSA consumer complaints and 0 safety recalls, while the MERCURY LYNX (1982–1987, 6 model years) carries 35 complaints and 0 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 7 vs 0 crashes, 2 vs 13 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the MACK MACK, the leading complaint category is tires (7 filings), followed by wheels and power train:driveline:driveshaft. For the MERCURY LYNX, it is engine and engine cooling:engine:gasoline (5), ahead of electrical system:ignition:switch and electrical system:wiring. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

MACK MACK vs MERCURY LYNX - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
MACK MACK Metric MERCURY LYNX
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
35 Total Complaints 35
0 Total Recalls 0
7 Crashes Reported 0
2 Fires Reported 13
11 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
16 years Years on Market 6 years

Top Complaint Categories

TIRES
7
0
WHEELS
5
0
POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE:DRIVESHAFT
5
0
SEATS
3
0
SERVICE BRAKES, AIR
2
0
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE
0
5
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:IGNITION:SWITCH
0
5
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING
0
4
MACK MACK MERCURY LYNX

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MACK MACK or MERCURY LYNX?
MACK MACK has 35 total NHTSA complaints with 7 crashes, while MERCURY LYNX has 35 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does MACK MACK have compared to MERCURY LYNX?
MACK MACK has 0 recalls across 16 model years, while MERCURY LYNX has 0 recalls across 6 model years.
What are the most common problems with MACK MACK?
The most commonly reported issues for MACK MACK are: TIRES (7 complaints), WHEELS (5 complaints), POWER TRAIN:DRIVELINE:DRIVESHAFT (5 complaints), SEATS (3 complaints), SERVICE BRAKES, AIR (2 complaints).
What are the most common problems with MERCURY LYNX?
The most commonly reported issues for MERCURY LYNX are: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE (5 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:IGNITION:SWITCH (5 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING (4 complaints), STEERING: STEERING WHEEL/HANDLE BAR (3 complaints), STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS (2 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data