Comparison

LINCOLN MKC vs NISSAN JUKE

Side-by-side comparison of the LINCOLN MKC and NISSAN JUKE drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the LINCOLN MKC (2015–2019) and the NISSAN JUKE (2011–2017), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The LINCOLN MKC (2015–2019, 5 model years) carries 644 NHTSA consumer complaints and 14 safety recalls, while the NISSAN JUKE (2011–2017, 7 model years) carries 641 complaints and 7 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 30 vs 32 crashes, 16 vs 14 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the LINCOLN MKC, the leading complaint category is engine (271 filings), followed by electrical system and unknown or other. For the NISSAN JUKE, it is engine (174), ahead of power train and fuel/propulsion system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the LINCOLN MKC an average 4/5 crash-test rating versus 4/5 for the NISSAN JUKE, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

LINCOLN MKC vs NISSAN JUKE - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
LINCOLN MKC Metric NISSAN JUKE
4/5 Avg Safety Rating 4/5
644 Total Complaints 641
14 Total Recalls 7
30 Crashes Reported 32
16 Fires Reported 14
15 Injuries Reported 19
0 Deaths Reported 0
5 years Years on Market 7 years

Top Complaint Categories

ENGINE
271
174
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
59
66
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
55
51
POWER TRAIN
45
72
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
34
0
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
0
70
LINCOLN MKC NISSAN JUKE

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, LINCOLN MKC or NISSAN JUKE?
LINCOLN MKC has 644 total NHTSA complaints with 30 crashes, while NISSAN JUKE has 641 complaints with 32 crashes. Average safety ratings are 4/5 vs 4/5 respectively.
How many recalls does LINCOLN MKC have compared to NISSAN JUKE?
LINCOLN MKC has 14 recalls across 5 model years, while NISSAN JUKE has 7 recalls across 7 model years.
What are the most common problems with LINCOLN MKC?
The most commonly reported issues for LINCOLN MKC are: ENGINE (271 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (59 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (55 complaints), POWER TRAIN (45 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING (34 complaints).
What are the most common problems with NISSAN JUKE?
The most commonly reported issues for NISSAN JUKE are: ENGINE (174 complaints), POWER TRAIN (72 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (70 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (66 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (51 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data