Comparison

LINCOLN LS vs SUZUKI FORENZA

Side-by-side comparison of the LINCOLN LS and SUZUKI FORENZA drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the LINCOLN LS (2000–2006) and the SUZUKI FORENZA (2004–2008), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The LINCOLN LS (2000–2006, 7 model years) carries 1,366 NHTSA consumer complaints and 3 safety recalls, while the SUZUKI FORENZA (2004–2008, 5 model years) carries 1,360 complaints and 6 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 111 vs 73 crashes, 6 vs 85 fires, and 4 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the LINCOLN LS, the leading complaint category is suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint (143 filings), followed by air bags and suspension. For the SUZUKI FORENZA, it is power train (248), ahead of electrical system and air bags. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

LINCOLN LS vs SUZUKI FORENZA - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
LINCOLN LS Metric SUZUKI FORENZA
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
1,366 Total Complaints 1,360
3 Total Recalls 6
111 Crashes Reported 73
6 Fires Reported 85
68 Injuries Reported 73
4 Deaths Reported 0
7 years Years on Market 5 years

Top Complaint Categories

SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER BALL JOINT
143
0
AIR BAGS
80
122
SUSPENSION
71
0
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
65
0
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
64
111
POWER TRAIN
0
248
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
0
162
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
0
90
LINCOLN LS SUZUKI FORENZA

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, LINCOLN LS or SUZUKI FORENZA?
LINCOLN LS has 1,366 total NHTSA complaints with 111 crashes, while SUZUKI FORENZA has 1,360 complaints with 73 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does LINCOLN LS have compared to SUZUKI FORENZA?
LINCOLN LS has 3 recalls across 7 model years, while SUZUKI FORENZA has 6 recalls across 5 model years.
What are the most common problems with LINCOLN LS?
The most commonly reported issues for LINCOLN LS are: SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER BALL JOINT (143 complaints), AIR BAGS (80 complaints), SUSPENSION (71 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING (65 complaints), POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION (64 complaints).
What are the most common problems with SUZUKI FORENZA?
The most commonly reported issues for SUZUKI FORENZA are: POWER TRAIN (248 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (162 complaints), AIR BAGS (122 complaints), POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION (111 complaints), EXTERIOR LIGHTING (90 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data