Comparison

LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV vs MAZDA CX9

Side-by-side comparison of the LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV and MAZDA CX9 drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV (2020–2023) and the MAZDA CX9 (2007–2010), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV (2020–2023, 4 model years) carries 58 NHTSA consumer complaints and 1 safety recall, while the MAZDA CX9 (2007–2010, 2 model years) carries 58 complaints and 1 recall. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 6 vs 2 crashes, 0 vs 2 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV, the leading complaint category is electrical system (13 filings), followed by engine and power train. For the MAZDA CX9, it is service brakes (15), ahead of air bags and suspension. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV vs MAZDA CX9 - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV Metric MAZDA CX9
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
58 Total Complaints 58
1 Total Recalls 1
6 Crashes Reported 2
0 Fires Reported 2
3 Injuries Reported 3
0 Deaths Reported 0
4 years Years on Market 2 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
13
0
ENGINE
8
6
POWER TRAIN
5
3
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
3
0
SERVICE BRAKES
3
15
AIR BAGS
0
13
SUSPENSION
0
10
LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV MAZDA CX9

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV or MAZDA CX9?
LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV has 58 total NHTSA complaints with 6 crashes, while MAZDA CX9 has 58 complaints with 2 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV have compared to MAZDA CX9?
LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV has 1 recalls across 4 model years, while MAZDA CX9 has 1 recalls across 2 model years.
What are the most common problems with LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV?
The most commonly reported issues for LINCOLN AVIATOR PHEV are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (13 complaints), ENGINE (8 complaints), POWER TRAIN (5 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (3 complaints), SERVICE BRAKES (3 complaints).
What are the most common problems with MAZDA CX9?
The most commonly reported issues for MAZDA CX9 are: SERVICE BRAKES (15 complaints), AIR BAGS (13 complaints), SUSPENSION (10 complaints), ENGINE (6 complaints), POWER TRAIN (3 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data