Comparison

JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 vs SUZUKI XL-7

Side-by-side comparison of the JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 and SUZUKI XL-7 drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 (2006–2006) and the SUZUKI XL-7 (2001–2006), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 (2006–2006, 1 model years) carries 217 NHTSA consumer complaints and 0 safety recalls, while the SUZUKI XL-7 (2001–2006, 6 model years) carries 219 complaints and 3 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 7 vs 39 crashes, 0 vs 9 fires, and 0 vs 3 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the JEEP COMMANDER 4X2, the leading complaint category is electrical system (58 filings), followed by engine and engine cooling and engine and engine cooling:engine. For the SUZUKI XL-7, it is air bags (38), ahead of vehicle speed control and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 vs SUZUKI XL-7 - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 Metric SUZUKI XL-7
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
217 Total Complaints 219
0 Total Recalls 3
7 Crashes Reported 39
0 Fires Reported 9
6 Injuries Reported 29
0 Deaths Reported 3
1 years Years on Market 6 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
58
11
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
21
0
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE
12
0
POWER TRAIN
11
0
ENGINE
11
0
AIR BAGS
0
38
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
0
13
STEERING
0
9
JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 SUZUKI XL-7

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 or SUZUKI XL-7?
JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 has 217 total NHTSA complaints with 7 crashes, while SUZUKI XL-7 has 219 complaints with 39 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 have compared to SUZUKI XL-7?
JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 has 0 recalls across 1 model years, while SUZUKI XL-7 has 3 recalls across 6 model years.
What are the most common problems with JEEP COMMANDER 4X2?
The most commonly reported issues for JEEP COMMANDER 4X2 are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (58 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING (21 complaints), ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE (12 complaints), POWER TRAIN (11 complaints), ENGINE (11 complaints).
What are the most common problems with SUZUKI XL-7?
The most commonly reported issues for SUZUKI XL-7 are: AIR BAGS (38 complaints), VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL (13 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (11 complaints), STEERING (9 complaints), SEAT BELTS (8 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data