Comparison

INTERNATIONAL 4300 vs VOLVO XC60PHEV

Side-by-side comparison of the INTERNATIONAL 4300 and VOLVO XC60PHEV drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,054,142 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles since 1995, as of June 2026. This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the INTERNATIONAL 4300 (2002–2013) and the VOLVO XC60PHEV (2020–2026), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The INTERNATIONAL 4300 (2002–2013, 12 model years) carries 58 NHTSA consumer complaints and 51 safety recalls, while the VOLVO XC60PHEV (2020–2026, 4 model years) carries 4 complaints and 3 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 11 vs 0 crashes, 4 vs 0 fires, and 3 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the INTERNATIONAL 4300, the leading complaint category is electrical system (8 filings), followed by engine and suspension. For the VOLVO XC60PHEV, it is electrical system (3), ahead of visibility/wiper. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

INTERNATIONAL 4300 vs VOLVO XC60PHEV - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
INTERNATIONAL 4300 Metric VOLVO XC60PHEV
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
58 Total Complaints 4
51 Total Recalls 3
11 Crashes Reported 0
4 Fires Reported 0
3 Injuries Reported 0
3 Deaths Reported 0
12 years Years on Market 4 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
8
3
ENGINE
5
0
SUSPENSION
4
0
SERVICE BRAKES
4
0
WHEELS
3
0
VISIBILITY/WIPER
0
1
INTERNATIONAL 4300 VOLVO XC60PHEV

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, INTERNATIONAL 4300 or VOLVO XC60PHEV?
INTERNATIONAL 4300 has 58 total NHTSA complaints with 11 crashes, while VOLVO XC60PHEV has 4 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does INTERNATIONAL 4300 have compared to VOLVO XC60PHEV?
INTERNATIONAL 4300 has 51 recalls across 12 model years, while VOLVO XC60PHEV has 3 recalls across 4 model years.
What are the most common problems with INTERNATIONAL 4300?
The most commonly reported issues for INTERNATIONAL 4300 are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (8 complaints), ENGINE (5 complaints), SUSPENSION (4 complaints), SERVICE BRAKES (4 complaints), WHEELS (3 complaints).
What are the most common problems with VOLVO XC60PHEV?
The most commonly reported issues for VOLVO XC60PHEV are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (3 complaints), VISIBILITY/WIPER (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data