Comparison

FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC vs MAZDA CX-30

Side-by-side comparison of the FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC and MAZDA CX-30 drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC (2012–2017) and the MAZDA CX-30 (2020–2025), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC (2012–2017, 6 model years) carries 312 NHTSA consumer complaints and 4 safety recalls, while the MAZDA CX-30 (2020–2025, 6 model years) carries 313 complaints and 7 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 6 vs 40 crashes, 2 vs 1 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC, the leading complaint category is electrical system (79 filings), followed by power train and engine. For the MAZDA CX-30, it is engine (63), ahead of unknown or other and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC vs MAZDA CX-30 - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC Metric MAZDA CX-30
N/A Avg Safety Rating 5/5
312 Total Complaints 313
4 Total Recalls 7
6 Crashes Reported 40
2 Fires Reported 1
5 Injuries Reported 25
0 Deaths Reported 0
6 years Years on Market 6 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
79
31
POWER TRAIN
78
0
ENGINE
42
63
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
33
0
STEERING
23
0
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
0
40
SERVICE BRAKES
0
21
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING
0
16
FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC MAZDA CX-30

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC or MAZDA CX-30?
FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC has 312 total NHTSA complaints with 6 crashes, while MAZDA CX-30 has 313 complaints with 40 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC have compared to MAZDA CX-30?
FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC has 4 recalls across 6 model years, while MAZDA CX-30 has 7 recalls across 6 model years.
What are the most common problems with FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC?
The most commonly reported issues for FORD FOCUS ELECTRIC are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (79 complaints), POWER TRAIN (78 complaints), ENGINE (42 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (33 complaints), STEERING (23 complaints).
What are the most common problems with MAZDA CX-30?
The most commonly reported issues for MAZDA CX-30 are: ENGINE (63 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (40 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (31 complaints), SERVICE BRAKES (21 complaints), FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING (16 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data