FORD EXPLORER vs MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE

The FORD EXPLORER (1977–2025, 43 model years) carries 42,132 NHTSA consumer complaints and 262 safety recalls, while the MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE (1989–2012, 24 model years) carries 2,784 complaints and 48 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 2,324 vs 328 crashes, 975 vs 83 fires, and 282 vs 13 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the FORD EXPLORER, the leading complaint category is steering (3601 filings), followed by unknown or other and power train. For the MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE, it is service brakes (216), ahead of wheels:rim and engine and engine cooling:engine. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the FORD EXPLORER an average 4.3/5 crash-test rating versus 0/5 for the MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.