FORD EXPEDITION vs LINCOLN CONTINENTAL

The FORD EXPEDITION (1991–2025, 34 model years) carries 11,443 NHTSA consumer complaints and 134 safety recalls, while the LINCOLN CONTINENTAL (1975–2020, 30 model years) carries 2,542 complaints and 18 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 725 vs 115 crashes, 834 vs 114 fires, and 56 vs 11 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the FORD EXPEDITION, the leading complaint category is electrical system (1043 filings), followed by power train and engine. For the LINCOLN CONTINENTAL, it is engine and engine cooling:engine (235), ahead of engine and engine cooling:engine:gasoline and power train:automatic transmission. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the FORD EXPEDITION an average 4.5/5 crash-test rating versus 5/5 for the LINCOLN CONTINENTAL, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.