FORD ESCAPE vs MAZDA CX-9

The FORD ESCAPE (2000–2025, 26 model years) carries 34,642 NHTSA consumer complaints and 220 safety recalls, while the MAZDA CX-9 (2007–2023, 17 model years) carries 1,785 complaints and 47 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 1,093 vs 88 crashes, 741 vs 15 fires, and 24 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the FORD ESCAPE, the leading complaint category is engine (6617 filings), followed by power train and steering. For the MAZDA CX-9, it is service brakes (411), ahead of engine and power train. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the FORD ESCAPE an average 4.4/5 crash-test rating versus 3.5/5 for the MAZDA CX-9, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.