Comparison
FORD C-MAX ENERGI vs SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R
Side-by-side comparison of the FORD C-MAX ENERGI and SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the FORD C-MAX ENERGI (2013–2017) and the SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R (2006–2011), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.
The FORD C-MAX ENERGI (2013–2017, 5 model years) carries 147 NHTSA consumer complaints and 1 safety recall, while the SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R (2006–2011, 5 model years) carries 146 complaints and 0 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 12 vs 2 crashes, 5 vs 3 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.
Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the FORD C-MAX ENERGI, the leading complaint category is electrical system (45 filings), followed by steering and power train. For the SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R, it is power train (66), ahead of power train:manual transmission and engine. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.
Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.
| FORD C-MAX ENERGI | Metric | SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | Avg Safety Rating | N/A |
| 147 | Total Complaints | 146 ✔ |
| 1 | Total Recalls | 0 ✔ |
| 12 | Crashes Reported | 2 ✔ |
| 5 | Fires Reported | 3 ✔ |
| 7 | Injuries Reported | 4 ✔ |
| 0 | Deaths Reported | 0 |
| 5 years | Years on Market | 5 years |
Top Complaint Categories
Also Compare
Compare FORD C-MAX ENERGI with:
Compare SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R with:
Compare Another Pair
Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.
Go to Compare Tool →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, FORD C-MAX ENERGI or SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R?▼
How many recalls does FORD C-MAX ENERGI have compared to SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R?▼
What are the most common problems with FORD C-MAX ENERGI?▼
What are the most common problems with SUZUKI BOULEVARD M109R?▼
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data