Comparison

CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE vs JAGUAR XF

Side-by-side comparison of the CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE and JAGUAR XF drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE (2004–2008) and the JAGUAR XF (2009–2022), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE (2004–2008, 5 model years) carries 516 NHTSA consumer complaints and 1 safety recall, while the JAGUAR XF (2009–2022, 11 model years) carries 520 complaints and 31 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 5 vs 25 crashes, 1 vs 19 fires, and 0 vs 1 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE, the leading complaint category is electrical system (74 filings), followed by structure:body and visibility/wiper. For the JAGUAR XF, it is fuel/propulsion system (103), ahead of air bags and engine. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE vs JAGUAR XF - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE Metric JAGUAR XF
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
516 Total Complaints 520
1 Total Recalls 31
5 Crashes Reported 25
1 Fires Reported 19
11 Injuries Reported 16
0 Deaths Reported 1
5 years Years on Market 11 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
74
39
STRUCTURE:BODY
50
0
VISIBILITY/WIPER
47
0
AIR BAGS
47
71
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
42
41
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
0
103
ENGINE
0
62
CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE JAGUAR XF

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE or JAGUAR XF?
CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE has 516 total NHTSA complaints with 5 crashes, while JAGUAR XF has 520 complaints with 25 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE have compared to JAGUAR XF?
CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE has 1 recalls across 5 model years, while JAGUAR XF has 31 recalls across 11 model years.
What are the most common problems with CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE?
The most commonly reported issues for CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (74 complaints), STRUCTURE:BODY (50 complaints), VISIBILITY/WIPER (47 complaints), AIR BAGS (47 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (42 complaints).
What are the most common problems with JAGUAR XF?
The most commonly reported issues for JAGUAR XF are: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (103 complaints), AIR BAGS (71 complaints), ENGINE (62 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (41 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (39 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data