Comparison

CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE vs VOLVO XC60MHEV

Side-by-side comparison of the CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE and VOLVO XC60MHEV drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE (2011–2011) and the VOLVO XC60MHEV (2023–2026), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE (2011–2011, 1 model years) carries 56 NHTSA consumer complaints and 1 safety recall, while the VOLVO XC60MHEV (2023–2026, 2 model years) carries 4 complaints and 2 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 1 vs 0 crashes, 0 vs 0 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE, the leading complaint category is air bags (11 filings), followed by seat belts and engine. For the VOLVO XC60MHEV, it is tires (2), ahead of visibility/wiper and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE vs VOLVO XC60MHEV - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE Metric VOLVO XC60MHEV
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
56 Total Complaints 4
1 Total Recalls 2
1 Crashes Reported 0
0 Fires Reported 0
0 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
1 years Years on Market 2 years

Top Complaint Categories

AIR BAGS
11
0
SEAT BELTS
7
0
ENGINE
6
0
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
5
1
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
4
0
TIRES
0
2
VISIBILITY/WIPER
0
1
CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE VOLVO XC60MHEV

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE or VOLVO XC60MHEV?
CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE has 56 total NHTSA complaints with 1 crashes, while VOLVO XC60MHEV has 4 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE have compared to VOLVO XC60MHEV?
CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE has 1 recalls across 1 model years, while VOLVO XC60MHEV has 2 recalls across 2 model years.
What are the most common problems with CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE?
The most commonly reported issues for CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE are: AIR BAGS (11 complaints), SEAT BELTS (7 complaints), ENGINE (6 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (5 complaints), EXTERIOR LIGHTING (4 complaints).
What are the most common problems with VOLVO XC60MHEV?
The most commonly reported issues for VOLVO XC60MHEV are: TIRES (2 complaints), VISIBILITY/WIPER (1 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data