CHEVROLET TRAVERSE vs NISSAN MURANO

The CHEVROLET TRAVERSE (2009–2026, 18 model years) carries 7,542 NHTSA consumer complaints and 32 safety recalls, while the NISSAN MURANO (2003–2026, 24 model years) carries 7,404 complaints and 26 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 250 vs 203 crashes, 51 vs 57 fires, and 3 vs 3 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHEVROLET TRAVERSE, the leading complaint category is engine (1054 filings), followed by air bags and steering. For the NISSAN MURANO, it is seats (1306), ahead of power train and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the CHEVROLET TRAVERSE an average 4.9/5 crash-test rating versus 4.6/5 for the NISSAN MURANO, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.