Comparison

CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID vs RAM PROMASTER CITY

Side-by-side comparison of the CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID and RAM PROMASTER CITY drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID (2008–2012) and the RAM PROMASTER CITY (2015–2022), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID (2008–2012, 5 model years) carries 139 NHTSA consumer complaints and 0 safety recalls, while the RAM PROMASTER CITY (2015–2022, 8 model years) carries 139 complaints and 10 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 12 vs 2 crashes, 3 vs 4 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID, the leading complaint category is electrical system (21 filings), followed by air bags and unknown or other. For the RAM PROMASTER CITY, it is engine (37), ahead of electrical system and power train. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID vs RAM PROMASTER CITY - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID Metric RAM PROMASTER CITY
4/5 Avg Safety Rating N/A
139 Total Complaints 139
0 Total Recalls 10
12 Crashes Reported 2
3 Fires Reported 4
4 Injuries Reported 2
0 Deaths Reported 0
5 years Years on Market 8 years

Top Complaint Categories

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
21
27
AIR BAGS
17
0
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
15
9
ENGINE
12
37
POWER TRAIN
10
24
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
0
7
CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID RAM PROMASTER CITY

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID or RAM PROMASTER CITY?
CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID has 139 total NHTSA complaints with 12 crashes, while RAM PROMASTER CITY has 139 complaints with 2 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID have compared to RAM PROMASTER CITY?
CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID has 0 recalls across 5 model years, while RAM PROMASTER CITY has 10 recalls across 8 model years.
What are the most common problems with CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID?
The most commonly reported issues for CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID are: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (21 complaints), AIR BAGS (17 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (15 complaints), ENGINE (12 complaints), POWER TRAIN (10 complaints).
What are the most common problems with RAM PROMASTER CITY?
The most commonly reported issues for RAM PROMASTER CITY are: ENGINE (37 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (27 complaints), POWER TRAIN (24 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (9 complaints), EXTERIOR LIGHTING (7 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data