CHEVROLET EQUINOX vs SUBARU OUTBACK

The CHEVROLET EQUINOX (2005–2026, 22 model years) carries 12,122 NHTSA consumer complaints and 47 safety recalls, while the SUBARU OUTBACK (1995–2025, 31 model years) carries 12,065 complaints and 189 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 548 vs 652 crashes, 135 vs 128 fires, and 9 vs 8 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHEVROLET EQUINOX, the leading complaint category is engine (2718 filings), followed by visibility/wiper and electrical system. For the SUBARU OUTBACK, it is electrical system (2134), ahead of visibility/wiper and unknown or other. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the CHEVROLET EQUINOX an average 3.6/5 crash-test rating versus 4.9/5 for the SUBARU OUTBACK, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.