CHEVROLET CAVALIER vs TOYOTA 4RUNNER

The CHEVROLET CAVALIER (1982–2005, 24 model years) carries 6,452 NHTSA consumer complaints and 23 safety recalls, while the TOYOTA 4RUNNER (1984–2026, 43 model years) carries 6,404 complaints and 121 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 554 vs 391 crashes, 167 vs 63 fires, and 28 vs 13 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CHEVROLET CAVALIER, the leading complaint category is electrical system (437 filings), followed by service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip and engine and engine cooling:engine. For the TOYOTA 4RUNNER, it is structure:body (1376), ahead of suspension and unknown or other. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.