Comparison
CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT vs MITSUBISHI RAIDER
Side-by-side comparison of the CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT and MITSUBISHI RAIDER drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT (2002–2013) and the MITSUBISHI RAIDER (2006–2009), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.
The CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT (2002–2013, 11 model years) carries 126 NHTSA consumer complaints and 15 safety recalls, while the MITSUBISHI RAIDER (2006–2009, 4 model years) carries 126 complaints and 5 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 7 vs 9 crashes, 8 vs 1 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.
Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT, the leading complaint category is air bags (24 filings), followed by electrical system and service brakes. For the MITSUBISHI RAIDER, it is air bags (56), ahead of electrical system and power train. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.
Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.
| CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT | Metric | MITSUBISHI RAIDER |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | Avg Safety Rating | N/A |
| 126 | Total Complaints | 126 |
| 15 | Total Recalls | 5 ✔ |
| 7 ✔ | Crashes Reported | 9 |
| 8 | Fires Reported | 1 ✔ |
| 15 | Injuries Reported | 6 ✔ |
| 0 | Deaths Reported | 0 |
| 11 years ✔ | Years on Market | 4 years |
Top Complaint Categories
Also Compare
Compare CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT with:
Compare MITSUBISHI RAIDER with:
Compare Another Pair
Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.
Go to Compare Tool →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT or MITSUBISHI RAIDER?▼
How many recalls does CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT have compared to MITSUBISHI RAIDER?▼
What are the most common problems with CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT?▼
What are the most common problems with MITSUBISHI RAIDER?▼
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data