BUICK REGAL vs TOYOTA 4RUNNER

The BUICK REGAL (1978–2020, 39 model years) carries 4,444 NHTSA consumer complaints and 60 safety recalls, while the TOYOTA 4RUNNER (1984–2026, 43 model years) carries 6,404 complaints and 121 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 224 vs 391 crashes, 335 vs 63 fires, and 6 vs 13 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the BUICK REGAL, the leading complaint category is engine (422 filings), followed by electrical system and service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip. For the TOYOTA 4RUNNER, it is structure:body (1376), ahead of suspension and unknown or other. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the BUICK REGAL an average 3/5 crash-test rating versus 3.8/5 for the TOYOTA 4RUNNER, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.