BUICK LACROSSE vs MAZDA TRIBUTE

The BUICK LACROSSE (2005–2019, 15 model years) carries 2,882 NHTSA consumer complaints and 25 safety recalls, while the MAZDA TRIBUTE (2000–2011, 12 model years) carries 2,830 complaints and 22 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 148 vs 138 crashes, 87 vs 71 fires, and 1 vs 6 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the BUICK LACROSSE, the leading complaint category is electrical system (536 filings), followed by exterior lighting and air bags. For the MAZDA TRIBUTE, it is vehicle speed control (278), ahead of suspension and structure:body. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program gives the BUICK LACROSSE an average 5/5 crash-test rating versus 3/5 for the MAZDA TRIBUTE, aggregated across all model years with published scores. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.