Comparison

BMW X5 SAV vs NISSAN CUBE

Side-by-side comparison of the BMW X5 SAV and NISSAN CUBE drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the BMW X5 SAV (2003–2013) and the NISSAN CUBE (2009–2014), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The BMW X5 SAV (2003–2013, 9 model years) carries 293 NHTSA consumer complaints and 9 safety recalls, while the NISSAN CUBE (2009–2014, 6 model years) carries 294 complaints and 4 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 14 vs 11 crashes, 5 vs 9 fires, and 0 vs 1 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the BMW X5 SAV, the leading complaint category is air bags (53 filings), followed by engine and fuel/propulsion system. For the NISSAN CUBE, it is power train (48), ahead of electrical system and steering. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

BMW X5 SAV vs NISSAN CUBE - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
BMW X5 SAV Metric NISSAN CUBE
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
293 Total Complaints 294
9 Total Recalls 4
14 Crashes Reported 11
5 Fires Reported 9
14 Injuries Reported 13
0 Deaths Reported 1
9 years Years on Market 6 years

Top Complaint Categories

AIR BAGS
53
0
ENGINE
41
21
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
28
0
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
28
48
POWER TRAIN
27
48
STEERING
0
40
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
0
17
BMW X5 SAV NISSAN CUBE

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, BMW X5 SAV or NISSAN CUBE?
BMW X5 SAV has 293 total NHTSA complaints with 14 crashes, while NISSAN CUBE has 294 complaints with 11 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does BMW X5 SAV have compared to NISSAN CUBE?
BMW X5 SAV has 9 recalls across 9 model years, while NISSAN CUBE has 4 recalls across 6 model years.
What are the most common problems with BMW X5 SAV?
The most commonly reported issues for BMW X5 SAV are: AIR BAGS (53 complaints), ENGINE (41 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (28 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (28 complaints), POWER TRAIN (27 complaints).
What are the most common problems with NISSAN CUBE?
The most commonly reported issues for NISSAN CUBE are: POWER TRAIN (48 complaints), ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (48 complaints), STEERING (40 complaints), ENGINE (21 complaints), UNKNOWN OR OTHER (17 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data