Comparison

ALFA ROMEO 164 vs FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR

Side-by-side comparison of the ALFA ROMEO 164 and FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR drawn from the NHTSA consumer-complaint database, defect investigations, recall history, and NCAP crash-test ratings.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 2,000,000 consumer complaints have been filed against U.S. vehicles (2,054,142 as of August 2026). This is a head-to-head safety comparison between the ALFA ROMEO 164 (1991–1999) and the FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR (2013–2015), drawn from that federal complaint and recall record; see our methodology for how the figures are compiled.

The ALFA ROMEO 164 (1991–1999, 5 model years) carries 15 NHTSA consumer complaints and 0 safety recalls, while the FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR (2013–2015, 3 model years) carries 15 complaints and 1 recall. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 1 vs 0 crashes, 0 vs 0 fires, and 0 vs 0 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the ALFA ROMEO 164, the leading complaint category is power train:automatic transmission (2 filings), followed by visibility:defroster/defogger/hvac system and vehicle speed control. For the FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR, it is steering (5), ahead of power train and fuel/propulsion system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests, three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.

ALFA ROMEO 164 vs FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR - NHTSA complaint, recall, and safety rating comparison
ALFA ROMEO 164 Metric FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR
N/A Avg Safety Rating N/A
15 Total Complaints 15
0 Total Recalls 1
1 Crashes Reported 0
0 Fires Reported 0
0 Injuries Reported 0
0 Deaths Reported 0
5 years Years on Market 3 years

Top Complaint Categories

POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
2
0
VISIBILITY:DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER/HVAC SYSTEM
1
0
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
1
0
TIRES
1
0
SUSPENSION:FRONT
1
0
STEERING
0
5
POWER TRAIN
0
2
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
0
2
ALFA ROMEO 164 FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR

Compare Another Pair

Search for any two vehicle models to compare their safety records side by side.

Go to Compare Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ALFA ROMEO 164 or FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR?
ALFA ROMEO 164 has 15 total NHTSA complaints with 1 crashes, while FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR has 15 complaints with 0 crashes. Review individual model years for specific safety ratings.
How many recalls does ALFA ROMEO 164 have compared to FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR?
ALFA ROMEO 164 has 0 recalls across 5 model years, while FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR has 1 recalls across 3 model years.
What are the most common problems with ALFA ROMEO 164?
The most commonly reported issues for ALFA ROMEO 164 are: POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION (2 complaints), VISIBILITY:DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER/HVAC SYSTEM (1 complaints), VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL (1 complaints), TIRES (1 complaints), SUSPENSION:FRONT (1 complaints).
What are the most common problems with FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR?
The most commonly reported issues for FORD TAURUS POLICE INTERCEPTOR are: STEERING (5 complaints), POWER TRAIN (2 complaints), FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM (2 complaints), VISIBILITY/WIPER (1 complaints), SUSPENSION (1 complaints).

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls data