ACURA CL vs FORD F-150

The ACURA CL (1997–2004, 8 model years) carries 730 NHTSA consumer complaints and 10 safety recalls, while the FORD F-150 (1984–2025, 39 model years) carries 45,624 complaints and 291 recalls. Severity indicators for the pair split as follows: 49 vs 2,099 crashes, 4 vs 2,265 fires, and 7 vs 83 reported fatalities.

Raw complaint counts favor whichever nameplate has fewer vehicles on the road, so the cleaner lens is components: which specific part families concentrate each model's filings? For the ACURA CL, the leading complaint category is power train:automatic transmission (251 filings), followed by air bags and power train. For the FORD F-150, it is power train (6760), ahead of engine and electrical system. When the two vehicles cluster around the same component, the problem is likely a shared supplier or a shared federal standard under stress; when they diverge, each nameplate has its own defect signature independent of the other.

Average NCAP crash-test scores are not uniformly available for both nameplates in this dataset, which typically means one or both pre-date the 2011 rating methodology refresh. Use the side-by-side table below as your scorecard, but do not treat it as a verdict. Recall counts tell you how many defects the manufacturer has already been compelled to remedy; complaint counts tell you what owners are still flagging today; and safety ratings tell you how the vehicle performs in standardized barrier tests — three different lenses on the same underlying question. The "also compare" links at the bottom of this page let you triangulate against neighboring nameplates in each model's competitive set.